1962 Holden EK vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover LR3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (301 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (427 Nm) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover LR3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Holden | Land Rover |
| Model | EK | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 301 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 427 Nm |
