1962 Holden EK vs. 2005 Mazda 6
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 6 (119 HP) has 55 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (323 Nm) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2005 Mazda 6 | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | 6 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 119 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 323 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
