1962 Holden EK vs. 2005 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2005 Seat Arosa is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Seat Arosa. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 2005 Seat Arosa.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Seat Arosa. (86 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2005 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Holden | Seat |
| Model | EK | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 49 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 86 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
