1962 Holden EK vs. 2006 Honda Element
To start off, 2006 Honda Element is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Honda Element is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Honda Element (156 HP) has 92 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Honda Element should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Honda Element (218 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2006 Honda Element will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2006 Honda Element | |
| Make | Holden | Honda |
| Model | EK | Element |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 156 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 218 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
