1962 Holden EK vs. 2006 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Caddy (68 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Caddy should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. (140 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2006 Volkswagen Caddy | |
| Make | Holden | Volkswagen |
| Model | EK | Caddy |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1968 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 68 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
