1962 Holden EK vs. 2008 MG ZR
To start off, 2008 MG ZR is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZR (159 HP) has 95 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZR should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZR (174 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2008 MG ZR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2008 MG ZR | |
Make | Holden | MG |
Model | EK | ZR |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 159 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 174 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |