1962 Holden EK vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Rover 75 (158 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (215 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | EK | 75 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 215 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |