1962 Holden EK vs. 2008 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2008 Toyota Celica is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Toyota Celica (190 HP) has 126 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2008 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2008 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Celica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 190 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 180 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
