1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | EK | CTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 270 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
