1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jaguar XF (187 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jaguar XF (450 Nm) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XF |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 187 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
