1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2010 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,606 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda BT-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (123 HP) has 59 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda BT-50 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda BT-50 (206 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda BT-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2010 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 206 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |