1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2010 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (169 HP) has 105 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Nissan X-Trail (226 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2488 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 169 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 226 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
