1962 Holden EK vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP) has 213 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2010 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
| Make | Holden | Saturn |
| Model | EK | Outlook |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 277 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 253 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
