1962 Holden EK vs. 2011 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2011 Mercury Mariner is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Mercury Mariner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercury Mariner (177 HP) has 113 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercury Mariner should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mercury Mariner (184 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2011 Mercury Mariner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2011 Mercury Mariner | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | EK | Mariner |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 177 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
