1962 Holden EK vs. 2013 Aston Martin Virage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Virage is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Virage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (490 HP) has 426 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Virage should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Virage (569 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Virage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2013 Aston Martin Virage | |
Make | Holden | Aston Martin |
Model | EK | Virage |
Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 490 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 569 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |