1962 Holden EK vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP) has 250 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
| Make | Holden | Cadillac |
| Model | EK | XTS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 314 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 358 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
