1962 Holden EK vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (281 HP) has 217 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Wrangler (353 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Holden | Jeep |
| Model | EK | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 281 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
