1962 Holden EK vs. 2013 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC90 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC90 (237 HP) has 173 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volvo XC90 (320 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2013 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2013 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Holden | Volvo |
| Model | EK | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 237 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
