1962 Humber Hawk vs. 1979 Renault 20
To start off, 1979 Renault 20 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 250 kg more than 1979 Renault 20.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 20, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Humber Hawk | 1979 Renault 20 | |
| Make | Humber | Renault |
| Model | Hawk | 20 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 1647 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2670 mm |
