1962 Humber Hawk vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1983 Ford Ranger is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Ford Ranger (158 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1983 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1962 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1962 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Humber Hawk | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Humber | Ford |
Model | Hawk | Ranger |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4690 mm |