1962 Humber Hawk vs. 1994 Lancia Zeta

To start off, 1994 Lancia Zeta is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Lancia Zeta (89 HP @ 4100 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.

Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Lancia Zeta, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Lancia Zeta (182 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1994 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk. 1994 Lancia Zeta has automatic transmission and 1962 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1962 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1994 Lancia Zeta will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: