1962 Humber Hawk vs. 1998 Nissan Crew
To start off, 1998 Nissan Crew is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Nissan Crew (130 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Nissan Crew should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 195 kg more than 1998 Nissan Crew.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Nissan Crew (175 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 1998 Nissan Crew will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Humber Hawk | 1998 Nissan Crew | |
Make | Humber | Nissan |
Model | Hawk | Crew |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1240 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2670 mm |