1962 Humber Hawk vs. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 3,965 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (195 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 464 kg more than 1962 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Humber Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee (312 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 149 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Humber Hawk | 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Humber | Jeep |
Model | Hawk | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 3965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 195 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 312 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1899 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 78 L |