1962 Humber Hawk vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano (270 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 107 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Humber Hawk | 2004 Mercedes-Benz Viano | |
Make | Humber | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Hawk | Viano |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2265 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 73 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 163 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 2750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |