1962 Humber Hawk vs. 2005 Volvo V70
To start off, 2005 Volvo V70 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo V70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo V70 (134 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo V70 weights approximately 211 kg more than 1962 Humber Hawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo V70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Volvo V70 (280 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2005 Volvo V70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk. 2005 Volvo V70 has automatic transmission and 1962 Humber Hawk has manual transmission. 1962 Humber Hawk will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Volvo V70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Humber Hawk | 2005 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Humber | Volvo |
| Model | Hawk | V70 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 134 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 110 mm | 93.2 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 130 km/hour | 200 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1646 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 70 L |
