1962 Humber Hawk vs. 2006 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2006 Mazda Tribute is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mazda Tribute (153 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 306 kg more than 2006 Mazda Tribute.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mazda Tribute (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2006 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Humber Hawk | 2006 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Humber | Mazda |
| Model | Hawk | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2265 cc | 2260 cc |
| Horse Power | 73 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1129 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2630 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |
