1962 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1981 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1981 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Nissan Bluebird (81 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 230 kg more than 1981 Nissan Bluebird.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 121 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Bellel | 1981 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Bellel | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1962 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |