1962 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1998 Honda Integra
To start off, 1998 Honda Integra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,493 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Honda Integra weights approximately 29 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1962 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Bellel | 1998 Honda Integra | |
| Make | Isuzu | Honda |
| Model | Bellel | Integra |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 72 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1199 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |
