1962 Isuzu Bellel vs. 1998 Kia Elan
To start off, 1998 Kia Elan is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Kia Elan (151 HP) has 96 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1962 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Kia Elan, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1998 Kia Elan (186 Nm) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm). This means 1998 Kia Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Bellel | 1998 Kia Elan | |
Make | Isuzu | Kia |
Model | Bellel | Elan |
Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 1793 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 151 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 186 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2270 mm |