1962 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 305 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1962 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Rover 75, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. (121 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Bellel | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Isuzu | Rover |
Model | Bellel | 75 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 121 Nm | 240 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |