1962 Isuzu Bellel vs. 2010 Nissan Pixo
To start off, 2010 Nissan Pixo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Pixo (68 HP) has 13 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Bellel.
Because 1962 Isuzu Bellel is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Bellel. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Pixo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Bellel | 2010 Nissan Pixo | |
Make | Isuzu | Nissan |
Model | Bellel | Pixo |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 68 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2360 mm |