1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,156 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Matra-Simca Murena is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena (116 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Matra-Simca Murena should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena weights approximately 20 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
| Make | Isuzu | Matra-Simca |
| Model | Minx | Murena |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2156 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 116 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1050 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1760 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1230 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2440 mm |
