1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 1996 Italdesign Nazca
To start off, 1996 Italdesign Nazca is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,988 cc (12 cylinders), 1996 Italdesign Nazca is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Italdesign Nazca (346 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Italdesign Nazca should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 30 kg more than 1996 Italdesign Nazca.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Italdesign Nazca (470 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 358 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1996 Italdesign Nazca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Minx | 1996 Italdesign Nazca | |
Make | Isuzu | Italdesign |
Model | Minx | Nazca |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 4988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 346 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 470 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2090 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |