1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2000 Peugeot Kart Up
To start off, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Peugeot Kart Up is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (210 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Peugeot Kart Up (289 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Peugeot Kart Up will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Minx | 2000 Peugeot Kart Up | |
Make | Isuzu | Peugeot |
Model | Minx | Kart Up |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 289 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 82.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1090 mm |