1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2000 Toyota Corona
To start off, 2000 Toyota Corona is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,800 cc, 2000 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1962 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Corona, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Toyota Corona has automatic transmission and 1962 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1962 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Toyota Corona will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 2000 Toyota Corona | |
| Make | Isuzu | Toyota |
| Model | Minx | Corona |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1800 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
