1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2001 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2001 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Jeep Wrangler (190 Nm) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2001 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Isuzu | Jeep |
| Model | Minx | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2501 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 190 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 98.3 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 81 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
