1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2001 MCC ForTwo

To start off, 2001 MCC ForTwo is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Isuzu Minx (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2001 MCC ForTwo. (44 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Isuzu Minx should accelerate faster than 2001 MCC ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Minx weights approximately 350 kg more than 2001 MCC ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Isuzu Minx (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 MCC ForTwo. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1962 Isuzu Minx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 MCC ForTwo.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Isuzu Minx 2001 MCC ForTwo
Make Isuzu MCC
Model Minx ForTwo
Year Released 1962 2001
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 1491 cc 599 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 62 HP 44 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 71 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 680 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 2510 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1550 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1540 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 1810 mm