1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2004 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (294 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Jaguar XK weights approximately 775 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (411 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Isuzu Minx 2004 Jaguar XK
Make Isuzu Jaguar
Model Minx XK
Year Released 1962 2004
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1491 cc 4195 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 62 HP 294 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 112 Nm 411 Nm
Engine Bore Size 79 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 90 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1805 kg
Vehicle Length 4120 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1550 mm 1800 mm
Vehicle Height 1520 mm 1300 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2590 mm