1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 4,398 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 220 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1485 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Isuzu Minx. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (440 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 328 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover has automatic transmission and 1962 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1962 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Minx | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Isuzu | Land Rover |
Model | Minx | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 4398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 92.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 82.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2890 mm |