1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,376 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 480 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander (213 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Minx | 2005 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | Isuzu | Mitsubishi |
Model | Minx | Outlander |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2376 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 213 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 100 mm |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2760 mm |