1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2009 Pontiac Vibe
To start off, 2009 Pontiac Vibe is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Pontiac Vibe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Pontiac Vibe (159 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Vibe should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1962 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Pontiac Vibe, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Pontiac Vibe (220 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Pontiac Vibe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Isuzu Minx | 2009 Pontiac Vibe | |
Make | Isuzu | Pontiac |
Model | Minx | Vibe |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 159 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 112 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2610 mm |