1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2010 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2010 Mazda Tribute is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda Tribute (171 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda Tribute weights approximately 484 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda Tribute, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda Tribute (232 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda Tribute will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx. 2010 Mazda Tribute has automatic transmission and 1962 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1962 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda Tribute will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 2010 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 171 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 232 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1514 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4442 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1783 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2619 mm |
