1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2011 Mazda 2
To start off, 2011 Mazda 2 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mazda 2 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Because 1962 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Mazda 2 (119 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2011 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 2011 Mazda 2 | |
| Make | Isuzu | Mazda |
| Model | Minx | 2 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 1349 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 75 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 119 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1695 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1475 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2489 mm |
