1962 Isuzu Minx vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 350 more horse power than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1962 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford Mustang weights approximately 657 kg more than 1962 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (528 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 416 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Isuzu Minx.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Isuzu Minx | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Isuzu | Ford |
| Model | Minx | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1491 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 62 HP | 412 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 112 Nm | 528 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1687 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1417 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2720 mm |
