1962 Jaguar MK II vs. 1996 Acura TL
To start off, 1996 Acura TL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Acura TL (200 HP) has 80 more horse power than 1962 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1962 Jaguar MK II.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jaguar MK II | 1996 Acura TL | |
Make | Jaguar | Acura |
Model | MK II | TL |
Year Released | 1962 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2840 mm |