1962 Jaguar MK II vs. 2007 Nissan 1400
To start off, 2007 Nissan 1400 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK II (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2007 Nissan 1400. (63 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK II should accelerate faster than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Nissan 1400. (97 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Nissan 1400.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jaguar MK II | 2007 Nissan 1400 | |
Make | Jaguar | Nissan |
Model | MK II | 1400 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2483 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 97 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2310 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 45 L |