1962 Jaguar MK II vs. 2013 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2013 Ford C-MAX is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK II would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford C-MAX (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1962 Jaguar MK II. (120 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1962 Jaguar MK II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 302 kg more than 1962 Jaguar MK II. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK II is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK II. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK II (195 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Jaguar MK II | 2013 Ford C-MAX | |
| Make | Jaguar | Ford |
| Model | MK II | C-MAX |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2483 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 139 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 195 Nm | 175 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76.5 mm | 83 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 12.3:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1754 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4409 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2085 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1621 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 53 L |
