1962 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Kia K2700

To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 366 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Jaguar MK X 2005 Kia K2700
Make Jaguar Kia
Model MK X K2700
Year Released 1962 2005
Engine Size 3781 cc 2665 cc
Horse Power 252 HP 83 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4150 RPM
Torque 360 Nm 176 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87 mm 94.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 106 mm 95 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1896 kg 1530 kg
Wheelbase Size 2770 mm 2380 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 90 L 60 L