1962 Jaguar MK X vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 366 kg more than 2005 Kia K2700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jaguar MK X | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Jaguar | Kia |
Model | MK X | K2700 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 106 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 60 L |