1962 Jaguar MK X vs. 2006 Lexus RX
To start off, 2006 Lexus RX is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Lexus RX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2006 Lexus RX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 356 kg more than 2006 Lexus RX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Jaguar MK X is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Jaguar MK X. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lexus RX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Lexus RX. (323 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Lexus RX.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jaguar MK X | 2006 Lexus RX | |
Make | Jaguar | Lexus |
Model | MK X | RX |
Year Released | 1962 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 3310 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 323 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 73 L |