1962 Jaguar MK X vs. 2010 BMW 125
To start off, 2010 BMW 125 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Jaguar MK X. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Jaguar MK X would be higher. At 3,781 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Jaguar MK X is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Jaguar MK X (252 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2010 BMW 125. (215 HP @ 6700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Jaguar MK X should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW 125. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Jaguar MK X weights approximately 371 kg more than 2010 BMW 125. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1962 Jaguar MK X (360 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW 125. (270 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1962 Jaguar MK X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW 125.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Jaguar MK X | 2010 BMW 125 | |
Make | Jaguar | BMW |
Model | MK X | 125 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3781 cc | 2996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 252 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6700 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 231 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1896 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5130 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 90 L | 53 L |